Search for: "STATE v. GRAY"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am
These people are the salt of the earth and there is no gray in their lives. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:57 am
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:12 pm
Dohrmann v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:03 am
Eve Gray (UCT) opened with a neo-colonial background into South Africa’s copyright reform noting the interplay of colonialism in the fair use v fair dealing debate. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
Discusses whether the super injunction has had its day, following the Queen’s Bench Division rulings in DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB), AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB) and Gray v UVW [2010] EWHC 2367 (QB) in which anonymity orders, rather than super injunctions, were made. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:07 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:52 am
An interesting decision Wednesday by N.Y. trial court judge Thomas Marcelle (Albany County), Hines v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:06 am
Ferguson and State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
: Everpure, LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(CSI) v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:25 am
I have no doubt that, between her and McCain that Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
On Friday she slinked outside for her midday patrol and perched on a bench in Gray's Inn, with the new Vogue in paw. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
She cannot say what she really intended to publish. , Gray Area The decision in the Gray v UVW case (discussed on this blog a few weeks ago) was in many ways an elegant compromise in that it named the claimant not the defendant, and the judgement was neutral. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Jonathan Djanogly, replied for the Government. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:08 am
– open letter to Lord Mandelson urging removal of clause 17 from Digital Economy Bill (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General US Department of Justice: Microsoft documentation ‘substantially complete’ (Ars Technica) US Patents – Decisions CAFC finds specific case where claims need not be construed before determining validity: Perfect Web Techs, Inv v InfoUSA, Inc (GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Apple loses… [read post]
