Search for: "STATE v. SY" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,513
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 2:05 am
Monolithic Power Sys., Inc., 467 F.3d 1355, 1364-66 (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:27 am
"[E]very court retains continuing jurisdiction to reconsider its [own] prior interlocutory orders during the pendency of the action" (Liss v Trans Auto Sys., 68 NY2d 15, 20 [1986]), and may do so "regardless of statutory time limits concerning motions to reargue" (id.). [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:13 pm
  While the court did state the disclosure of the expert's neutrality to the jury "trouble[d] this court to some extent," in the Ninth Circuit district courts have "wide latitude" to make such appointments.On the merits, the court held substantial evidence supported the jury's implicit factual finding underlying its obviousness determination, namely all elements of the asserted claims were present in the prior art, based on the… [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
An opportunity for defendants to shift the balance of power and wrest complete control over the company can constitute irreparable injury (see Vanderminden v Vanderminden, 226 AD2d 1037, 1041 [1996]; Casita, LP v Maplewood Equity Partners [Offshore] Ltd., 17 Misc 3d 1137A, *8 [2007]; see also Matter of Brenner v Hart Sys., 114 AD2d 363, 366 [1985]). [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]