Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 23,629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
ShareIf the justices’ comments during Wednesday’s argument in New York v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 11:02 am
In Delaware v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:00 am
See Case Review: Art Works, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
[1] SEC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 8:20 am
Conner DPM, P.C. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
But it was their worst-selling album that helped redefine an obscure element of copyright law that will be essential to the development of modern generative artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 10:03 pm
Abrams v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
Playing games and meeting up with friends in a virtual environment is second nature for them, and so is the ability to buy and sell goods in that virtual environment, often in the form of visual or skill enhancements in gameplay. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
Last week, in Friel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:34 am
By Suzanne CosgroveNew York Attorney General Letitia James has sued the cryptocurrency platform CoinEx for falsely representing itself as a crypto exchange and failing to properly register the company with U.S. regulators or with the state of New York, a violation of New York’s Martin Act (People Of The State Of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General Of The State Of New York, v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am
The best way to avoid that dispute is with a well-crafted buy-sell agreement specifying a means for valuing and liquidating the deceased member’s interest upon their death. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council [2023] UKSC 8, in which the Court will determine when a local authority sells land which is subject to a statutory trust for public recreational purposes without complying with the relevant statutory requirements, does that trust continue or end? [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
In so far as the relevant public pays little attention to a sign which does not immediately give an indication of origin or destination of what it wishes to sell, but rather information which is exclusively promotional and abstract, it will not take the time to seek out the various possible functions of the expression or to memorise it as a trade mark (T-749/18). [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:37 pm
Madam Justice Horsman’s decision in Canfield v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:48 am
This here is a follow-up on Nokia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
” Carroll v. [read post]
