Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 5,602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2018, 7:45 pm
In the case of Amardien & Others v Registrar of Deeds & Others, the sellers took ten years to record the agreements after the purchasers moved in. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:20 am
Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:10 am
In Fuji Photo Film Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:31 pm
Earnouts have gotten some attention recently because of a recent case (Sonoran Scanners v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 12:29 pm
In Lotito v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:20 am
Preliminary questions were referred to the CJEU for clarification as to whether and under what circumstances Amazon might be held directly liable for trade mark infringement stemming from a third-party seller’s advertisement, bearing in mind that the CJEU already answered a related question regarding Amazon’s storage services in Coty v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:00 am
(See, Horn Waterproofing Corp. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:13 am
Balasco v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:37 am
The placeholder defines "marketing" (including brokering) to mean a sale of natural gas to any person or entity by a seller that is not an interstate pipeline, except when (1) the seller is selling gas solely from its own production, (2) the seller is selling gas solely from its own gathering or processing facilities, or (3) the seller is an intrastate natural gas pipeline or a local distribution company making an on-system sale. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Gentry v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 4:24 am
In Fulmer v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:46 pm
In Parque Towers Developers, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
" In Gann v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 11:03 am
–Dongguan Juyuan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:41 am
They sue sellers, sundry others, and their CPAs whom they say were hired to do the due diligence on the value of the business. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v Nicastro, 564 US 873, 888-889 [2011] [Breyer, J., concurring]). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to construe or… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:47 pm
B&W Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
While a Canadian court may give deference to the rules set by the seller, how closely a seller needs to follow those rules is not yet clear. [read post]
