Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States" Results 1381 - 1400 of 2,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: State Compensation Insurance Fund v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
That section says, Whenever the President finds that entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem appropriate.In contrast, the Court in Alabama… [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
United States 16-309 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am by John Elwood
 Supported by 13 other states as amici, Alabama argues that the 11th Circuit erred under AEDPA by too readily attributing error to the state court. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am by John Elwood
Alabama and Brookhart v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Scott Bomboy
The court is considering whether Alabama’s 2021 redistricting plan for seven seats in the United States House of Representatives violated Section 2 of the VRA because the map “packed” Black voters into one of the state’s voting districts, diminishing their voting power. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 8:27 am by Lisa McElroy
  The most typical original case is one like Alabama v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:29 pm by Ronald Mann
Kagan, for example, seemed to embrace the argument of Anthony Yang (representing the United States, in support of the Pueblo) that “Cabazon is all over this statute. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am by Sanford Rosen
Alabama (1961), a death penalty right-to-counsel precursor to Gideon v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:08 am by Kysa Crusco
Such discrimination would also violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as well (the federal Equal Protection Clause). [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
United States, 914 A.2d 1 (D.C. 2006) (discussed here), which analyzes  blank">Crawford v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]