Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 12,568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court’s Bauman opinion was a game changer, and after the false state of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we were pleased with the California Court of Appeal’s opinion in BNSF Railway v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:31 pm
In California, of course, state officials resumed recognizing same-sex marriages following the United States Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:04 pm
Related posts:Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:47 pm
In 2011, a unanimous Supreme Court held in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:12 am
On Semiconductor v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
United States, in which a same-sex couple married in California (during the period after the Supreme Court of California's ruling and before the voters approved Proposition 8) challenges, in a California federal district court, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), enacted by Congress in 1996. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
United States, in which a same-sex couple married in California (during the period after the Supreme Court of California's ruling and before the voters approved Proposition 8) challenges, in a California federal district court, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), enacted by Congress in 1996. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
The Ninth Circuit case in California: Sulitzer v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:59 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
While that decision may well be challenged before the California Supreme Court, it only underscores how California employees have an avenue to try to avoid the impact of United States Supreme Court decisions regarding class actions – PAGA claims. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:49 pm
Order here. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm
" Then, Chief Judge Lippman wrote that there is no material difference between the California statute struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]) "and our persistent felony offender sentencing statutes. [read post]
14 May 2009, 11:21 am
AB 793 (Statute of Limitations/Claims Relating to Discriminatory Compensation): This bill would follow the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:13 pm
The bill states the Legislature’s intent “to reject as a matter of California statutory law the rule under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution announced by the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
Pursuant to the express word of the United States Supreme Court itself. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:35 am
United States v. [read post]
