Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 1381 - 1400 of 23,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2023, 7:17 am by Giles Peaker
There has been a lot of fuss about this, but as Tessa Shepperson has sagely observed, it doesn’t really make much of a change to existing law. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am by Paige Collings
The technology was used to erroneously expel Black teenager Lamya Robinson from a public skating rink in Detroit after misidentifying her as a person who’d allegedly gotten into a fight there. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:59 am by Caroline Schmitz
But, nonetheless, on May 3, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in Traffic Jam Events LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am by David Post
" If the National Beef Producers Council brings a DCC action alleging the same basic facts as the NPPC did here, wouldn't a court, applying NPPC v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
We would be delighted if the debt ceiling truly were a mere paper tiger that could be easily shredded by stamping “$3 trillion” on a piece of platinum or issuing bonds with a face value of one dollar but sold for a hundred dollars each because they offer 40,100 percent in interest (which is the rate Treasury would need to offer to reproduce the payback on a conventional 3-month hundred-dollar T-bill that pays the roughly 5 percent current interest rate). [read post]
13 May 2023, 10:46 am by Russell Knight
Mutual Release Of Claims For Injury You only hurt the ones you love(d). [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[Thomas assigned the majority to Justice Gorsuch, but he couldn't hold five all the way. ] National Pork Producers v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132  (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
I’d covered complicated trials, been sued for libel, and sat through hearings of administrative tribunals. [read post]