Search for: "State v. Bell" Results 1381 - 1400 of 3,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am by Neil Rosenbaum
This more aggressive approach to weeding out defective class actions could be seen as the class analogue to Bell Atlantic Corp v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 12:52 pm by Carrie Dettmer Slye
The Blizzard opinion follows a growing line of federal and state court cases dismissing negligence claims based on data breaches for lack of injury, particularly in cases like Blizzard, where the plaintiffs could not allege identity theft. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:54 am
Again, the court of appeal found substantial evidence that individual issues predominate.The opinion, Bell v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
The anitrust case (Pacific  Bell Telephone, et al., v. linkLine Communications, et al., 07-512) is a test of the theory that a “prize squeeze” violates the Sherman Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
As the court stated, these pleadings were construed as allegations resulting from the Bell county negligence case. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:05 am
In her reply, [plaintiff] argues that she has complied by filing a short plain statement, and that Bell Atlantic [v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Sanders (07-1209) and   Pacific Bell Telephone Co. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
DJ Bell heard the application on 16 February 2022. [read post]