Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1381 - 1400 of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Swarthourt v Cooke, Supreme Court No. 10-333, the Court granted certiorari on a rather boring question concerning habeas corpus law: “Whether a federal court may grant habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner based on its view that the state court erred in applying the state-law standard of evidentiary sufficiency governing state parole decisions. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
(b) There can be no taking unless petitioner can show that, before the Florida Supreme Court’s decision, littoral property owners had rights to future accretions and to contact with the water superior to the States right to fill in its submerged land. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:32 am by Brandon W. Barnett
  A UCMJ conviction is deemed to have taken place on United States soil and the defendant's subsequent conviction is properly enhanced under Penal Code §12.42(c)(2)(b)(v) for that conviction. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
By Nina Rice* The history of New York’s statutory law pertaining to the art market is relatively brief despite the states long held status as the art capital of the United States, if not the world. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 4(2) specifies three categories of offenses that shall not be considered to be political offenses: (a) a murder or other willful crime against the person of a Head of State of one of the Contracting Parties, or of a member of the Head of States family; (b) an offense for which both Contracting Parties are obliged pursuant to a multilateral international agreement to extradite the person sought or to submit the case to their competent authorities… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
(c) La demanda de los Does, basada en contingencias, una o más de las cuales puede no ocurrir, es demasiado especulativa para presentar un caso real o controversia. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:01 pm
Such derogatory and undeserved comments serve no legitimate purpose, as they fail to advance Charron’s legal theories and violate MCR 7.212(C)(6), which requires an appellant’s brief to contain “[a]ll material facts, both favorable and unfavorable, [to be] fairly stated without argument or bias. [read post]