Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 1381 - 1400
of 10,077
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm
Callow Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:48 pm
(b) provides that any noncitizen who is a nonimmigrant, who is not fully vaccinated against COVID-19, and who, notwithstanding section 2(a) of the proclamation, is permitted to enter the United States by air travel pursuant to section 3(b) of this proclamation—in other words who is admitted based on a clear exception to the vaccination requirement—must agree to comply with applicable public health precautions established by the Director of the CDC to… [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am
V. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am
V. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
(note that under subsection (a), actual nudity or exposure does not have to occur) Under subsection (b), voyeurism is committed when: Person A observed or recorded Person B; Person A secretly observed or recorded Person B; Person B was in circumstances that gave rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy; Person B was:Nude, exposing genital organs or anal region or breasts, or engaged in explicit sexual activity; and The observation or recording of… [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
McCann v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:25 pm
Health & Safety Code § 171.209(e) ("The affirmative defense under Subsection (b) is not available if the United States Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
[B.] [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:25 pm
From the start of Judge Nelson Román's (long) opinion, in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:22 pm
Guevara v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
(e) Exclusion From Numerical Limitations. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:37 am
Sayler, Richard H., Boyer, Barry B., & Gooding, Jr., Robert E. (1968) The Warren Court: a Critical Analysis. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm
The “confusion test” – Sections 12(1)(d) and 16(3)(a) and (b) Section 12(1)(d) states that a mark is registrable if it is not confusing with a registered trademark; sections 16(3)(a) and (b) very similarly provided that a mark must not be confusing with a trademark that had previously been know or applied for. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:39 pm
E Effective Date – The date the insurance coverage begins. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 11:15 am
State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
