Search for: "State v. High"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 32,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2007, 11:32 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Limited [2007] HCA 38 the High Court upheld the ACCC's appeal against findings by the Full Federal Court that Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd was protected from the operation of the Trade Practices Act 1974 by Crown immunity. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 8:34 am
This would subject all law bloggers to the advertising rules of their state, and possibly others as well.Since there were two dissenting justices, an appeal lies as of right to New York's high court. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:20 pm
Yesterday, Gibbons v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:55 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:22 am
State, Mungin v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:24 pm
In Kurns et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:56 am
The United States Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:43 am
In Walden v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:30 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) CJ v Flintshire Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 393 (15 April 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Badger Trust, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWHC 768 (Admin) (16 April 2010) WJ (China), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 776 (Admin) (19 April 2010) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Yuanda (UK) Co Ltd v WW Gear… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions Department for Education v Molyneux [2012] EWCA Civ 193 (28 February 2012) Independent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 195 (28 February 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tuncel & Anor [2012] EWHC 402 (Admin) (28 February 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions Barclay Pharmaceuticals Ltd &… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:01 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Burgin & Anor v Commission of Police for the Metropolis & Ors [2011] EWHC 1835 (Admin) (13 July 2011) U & Partners(East Anglia) Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Broads Authority [2011] EWHC 1824 (Admin) (13 July 2011) RT, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1792 (Admin) (13 July 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Alstom Transport v Eurostar… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
Supreme Court’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:28 am
” The state high court pointed to language in the state constitution that said: “All persons have the inherent right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the enjoyment of the gains of their own industry. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 9:45 pm
In Lyons v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Times (Oct. 3, 2019). [20] United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm
DA 09-0570 92009-0570; 2010 MT 55) relied on Article V, Sec. 8 of Montana's Constitution, which states in relevant part: "[a legislator] shall not be questioned in any other place for any speech or debate in the legislature. [read post]
