Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Family Voices Coordinators participate in several groups within the state, including Title V/CSHCN, DD Council, Part C agency, CHIP board and parent and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
TM clerk was very different from patent counterparts—technical expertise v. experts in delicate art of distinguishing and classifying signs and words. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), WIPO Director General candidates’ presentations to members: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP rights arise in UN debate on the right to participate in cultural life: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP academies agree to galvanise efforts to promote IP education: (WIPO), What business people do to maximise protection of IP: (Ezine @rticles), Lorin Brennan’s memo on interaction between UNICITRAL guide and IP rights: (IP finance), … [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
DepositionsKF8901 .B63 2001Developing deposition skills : Polisi v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm
The amount stated in the good faith offer cannot be “less than the agency’s appraisal of just compensation. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (holding that state common law torts were something that was subject to preemption), Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
(5) A discussion of specific policy recommendations to deter the activities of notorious foreign infringers and encourage foreign businesses industry norms that promote the protection of intellectual property globally, including addressing— (A) whether notorious foreign infringers that engage in significant infringing should be prohibited by the laws of the States from seeking to raise capital United States, including offering stock to the public; and (B) whether the… [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
We've actually had this opinion kicking around for a week, since the folks representing the defendants passed it along, but between the stunning Kent non-event, Herrman being busy, and Bexis being slothful (or was it the other way around?) [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:09 am
Schwartz quotes our friend Kent Scheidegger on what will happen if Baird gets to rule and says Willingham was innocent. [read post]
