Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 44,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2022, 1:17 pm
Dow has been quoted as stating that ‘She speaks the truth.'"You get why that seems qualitatively different, right? [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 1:04 pm
He initially denied having any sexual contact with the victim, stating he knew it would be wrong because she was only 15 years old. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:14 pm
An earlier published opinion (Bartholomew) held that there was no statutory right for the state to appeal when the trial court reduced a felony wobbler to a misdemeanor prior to trial. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Which s/he does, reading the relevant CALCRIM instruction.And, of course, the relevant CALCRIM instruction accurately states the law. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
It's only in middle of the 11th page that the Court of Appeal states that defendant's 18 years old.Now you understand the argument. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Cheatham is entitled to double jeopardy protections -- not as a matter of constitutional law, but rather as a result of the part of the statute that says that in the relevant proceedings, "the person shall be entitled to the rights guaranteed under the federal and State Constitutions for criminal proceedings. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
” Miller v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:28 am
ACLU, Feb. 29, 2024 "The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas today granted a motion for preliminary injunction to block Texas Senate Bill 4 (88-4), which would permit local and state law enforcement to arrest, detain, and remove people they suspect to have entered Texas from another country without federal authorization. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
The author of Section 23123 expressly stated that it applied only to "holding a cell phone up to [one's] ear." [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:39 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
That states, in its entirety: "In my opinion the sentence imposed in this case is too harsh and I would not have imposed it were I the trial judge. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
One was whether the Court had jurisdiction to review a collateral state court’s decision not to apply Miller v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In United States Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:38 pm
In Crofoot v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm
People in court with family disputes make up the largest single category of users of free legal asisstance, not only in the United States but in all peer nations (most with legal aid programs significantly more generous than ours). [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am
However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm
Today, the ICA issued an unpublished memorandum opinion in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:36 am
Hodges (pdf) holding that states cannot ban same-sex marriage. [read post]
