Search for: "State v. Rhodes" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
  Courts in Rhode Island, Oklahoma and Texas have ruled against such recognition. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:42 pm
In short, the court declined jurisdiction because Rhode Island does not recognize same sex marriages.- Garry J. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:11 am
The court found the efforts to violate the Rhode Island Condominium Act.In Association Two Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 7:20 am
You may recall that the RIAA recently dropped its "John Doe" case against Rhode Island College students, where the ISP was located in Austin, Texas, in Arista Records v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:08 pm
The states with the highest percentages of Latino students attending highly segregated schools (90-100% minority) are: New York, Texas, California, Illinois, New Jersey, Arizona, Rhode Island, Florida, New Mexico, and Maryland.These rates of racial isolation are not inevitable. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Rhodes KINGS COUNTYCivil PracticeProperty Owner Granted Dismissal Of Complaint on Res Judicata GroundsDonaldson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
  In DISMISSING the appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, stated: Here, defendant sought a protective order and the court denied its motion, affording plaintiff the full relief sought in opposition (see Atlantic Hudson Realty v Rhodes, 271 AD2d 558 [2000]). [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Hardman, No. 08-1342 Absent any allegation that state officials were used to enforce the process, Defendant was not transformed into a state actor for section 1983 purposes when he issued a subpoena commanding the Plaintiff to appear at a pretrial deposition, even though the subpoena was issued in his capacity as a notary public and in the name of the state of Rhode Island. [read post]