Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 20,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 10:05 am
On Monday, January 26, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 12:49 am
Tenth Circuit concludes, in fraud case involving the sale of aircraft parts, cross-examination of character witnesses did not include impermissible guilt-assuming hypothetical questions based on the charges, but any error was harmless based on overwhelming evidence of guilt, in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:08 am
In MPT v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
” The sales contract did not state the square feet of the building. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
Keller et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm
” The decision provides important clarification on the standard laid out by the United States Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:57 am
In SWF Real Estate, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
In Route 231, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:56 pm
(The stay application is Stroup, et al., v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:10 am
Cir. 2007), the Federal Circuit held that US patent rights are only exhausted through a first sale “in the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
In Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:07 pm
The Court was asked to review Ninestar Technology Co. v United States International Trade Commission, to determine whether the first sale doctrine would apply to products protected by patents similarly to the way in which Kirtsaeng applied it to copyright products. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:11 am
Intengan v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 7:55 am
Aug. 13, 2019) Selected Related Posts: * Wisconsin Court Holds Amazon Can Be Strictly Liable for Marketplace Items–State Farm v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:23 pm
The other case, UMG v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:17 pm
This practice effectively ended when the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) held that such functionally limited claims did not meet the “written description” requirement of 35 USC 112 (Amgen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
Rentz (criminal jurisdiction, double jeopardy)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: State of Idaho v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:37 am
In Australia, sales of Samsung’s new Galaxy Tab 10.1 are on hold pending court action. [read post]
