Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
On January 21, 2010, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled to overturn a century of legal precedent in the case Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
ABC News quotes University of Texas law professor Lucas Powe, who speculates that the Justices will likely opt not to attend the State of the Union address next year, while Robert Barnes, writing for the Washington Post, points out that each Justice chooses whether to attend the State of the Union address each year (this year, Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Thomas all skipped the speech). [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:48 am
Although there are plenty of instances where Justices are more than willing to share their thoughts on the merits before full briefing and argument; for a recent example, you need look no further than Justice Thomas's most recent installment in his long-running debate with Justices Stevens and Breyer over the merits of so-called Lackey claims in his recent concurrence in the denial of cert in Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:46 am
Steven M. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am
Last Thursday's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:11 am
See also Daniels v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
As Justice Stevens explained in Randall v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
The Court applied the New Jersey v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
In the wake of the January 13 oral argument in American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:37 am
., joined, in which THOMAS, J., joined as to all but Part IV, and in which STEVENS, GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined as to Part IV. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
The Internet is abuzz about Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
Many have already weighed in on Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:45 pm
Much about today's decision was not unusual: The Court was split five-to-four, along typical ideological lines (Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy, and Scalia in the majority, Sotomayor, Breyer, Ginsburg, and Stevens dissenting). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
Bank of Boston v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
The Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:30 am
In so doing it has also overruled Austin v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:26 am
Justice Kennedy's opinion for the Court, concurring opinions by Justice Scalia (joined by Alito and Thomas in part) and Chief Justice Roberts (joined by Alito), and opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part by Justice Thomas and Justice Stevens (joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor). [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:22 am
Opinion of Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:45 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
