Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 4,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2019, 1:55 pm
Prometheus and Alice v. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am
Since then Listeria has been implicated in many outbreaks of food-borne illness, most commonly from exposure to contaminated dairy products and prepared meat products, including turkey and deli meats, pâté, hot dogs and seafood and fish. [4] Given its widespread presence in the environment and food supply, the ingestion of Listeria has been described as an “exceedingly common occurrence. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:04 pm
It doesn't show up in case law, in scholarly writing, or even in treatises on usury. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
This case arose in the aftermath of Matal v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 9:09 am
Cooper v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
”[59] Other long-term problems include the risk for hypertension, proteinuria (abnormal amounts of protein in the urine that can portend a decline in renal function), and reduced kidney filtration rate.[60] Since the longest available follow-up studies of HUS victims are 25 years, an accurate lifetime prognosis is not really available and remains controversial.[61] All that can be said for certain is that HUS causes permanent injury, and it requires a lifetime of close medical… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
But we’d still look at the D’s consumers: if Morton’s Salt sued Morton’s Sugar, we’d still look at sugar consumers—if they overlap that’s fine, but we shouldn’t assume that. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
That just doesn’t sound right. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
Such standards will determine how much legislation succeeds in shifting the focus from consumer choice to business behavior and thereby enables individuals to trust that personal information will be protected regardless of what notices they manage to read, pop-up windows they click through or privacy settings they adjust. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm
This means publishers and songwriters are effectively prevented from protecting their works and many have given up. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:50 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm
Global music revenue and box office revenue is up. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am
Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 8:17 am
Consumer Opinion LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 9:07 pm
That case, Turtle Islands Foods V. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
Hence, in unfair competition cases consumer protection and public interests were relevant factors to determine if a grace period could be granted. [read post]
