Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 4,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2007, 9:37 am
Taylor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Jacob and Brae V. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In this appeal to the Commissioner of Education, the petitioner [Petitioner] contended that certain actions taken by school district administrators [District] and the president of employee organization [Association] of a recognized or certified employee organization for the purposes of collective bargaining under Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the Taylor Law, were contrary to the terms of the relevant collective bargaining agreement [CBA] between the Association and the… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:49 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week in Herb Reed Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm
Today, the 5th Circuit clarified a procedural hurdle to that tactic in a small category of cases.In Taylor v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:09 am
Like in this case.The case is Taylor v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
" The Employee appealed but the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed PERB's determination.Citing Civil Service Bar Association, Local 237 v City of New York, 64 NY2d 188, the Appellate Division explained that PERB had rationally found that Employee failed to allege facts that would show that his Union had engaged in arbitrary, discriminatory or bad faith conduct, which is necessary to state a claim that the Union had breached its duty of fair representation within the meaning… [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
Given that there is no liability on the defendant, the defendant’s third party claim is dismissed.Read the decision at: Taylor’s Feed & Tires Ltd v Brennan Farms Ltd. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:17 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Wednesday, October 15, 2014:Wise Law Blog: Heckling the Home Team: Off-Duty Conduct and Dismissal for Cause Wise Law Blog: Are You "Just Happy to See Me," or Looking to Get Fired A Beginners Guide to Law Firm Video – Pt 2: Choosing Topics for Your Firm’s Videos A Fast-Food Non-Compete ClauseFive elements of assisted suicide case being heard Wednesday at Supreme Court Torture and the limits of… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Brown v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
California Bound: Slavery on the New Frontier, an exhibit curated by Tyree Boyd-Pates and Taylor Bythewood-Porter, is at the California African American Museum in Los Angeles through April 28.I'm grateful to Virginia Law's Aditya Bamzai for posting his amicus brief in PDR Network et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
" The Employee appealed but the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed PERB's determination.Citing Civil Service Bar Association, Local 237 v City of New York, 64 NY2d 188, the Appellate Division explained that PERB had rationally found that Employee failed to allege facts that would show that his Union had engaged in arbitrary, discriminatory or bad faith conduct, which is necessary to state a claim that the Union had breached its duty of fair representation within the meaning… [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:01 am
Truog Jahi McMath: Lessons LearnedMaya Scott Ferguson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:05 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:13 am
We will await the decisions in the parallel EPO proceedings in order to compare their approaches to patent validity.CopyrightKatfriend Caroline Theunis reflected on the copyright dispute behind Taylor Swift's decision to re-record her earlier albums after becoming dissatisfied with the way the record label was using its economic rights. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in McCord v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Taylor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:00 am
”** Law enforcement personnel including correction officers are public officers subject to the provisions of Public Officers Law §30(1)(e) [see Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03535.htm [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:12 am
[W]hile Patent Owner’s argument that the United States 'directed and controlled the allegedly infringing activity' is not without relevance, it does not bear directly on the categories identified by the Supreme Court in [Taylor v. [read post]
