Search for: "U. S. Federal Government" Results 1381 - 1400 of 5,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2020, 10:18 am by David Oscar Markus
 Justice Gorsuch's conclusion:The federal government promised the Creek a reservation in perpetuity. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am by Jonathan H. Adler
S. government agreed by treaty that "[t]he Creek country west of the Mississippi shall be solemnly guarantied to the Creek Indians. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:18 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The report offers a new window into the relationship between tech companies and the U.S. government, as well as an important detail about why such contracts are often difficult to find…” [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 1:04 pm by Matthew Fischer
The federal government is retracting their stance that they recognized initially which was that public safety was met by universities if they were able to continue their mission of educating, virtually. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
The Constitution’s Free Exercise Clause, all agree, does not call for that imbalanced result.1 Nor does the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), 42 U. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:15 am by Josh Blackman
He concludes that it is time to "reconsider" severability doctrine: In the end, I agree that 47 U. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
But a 2015 amendment to the TCPA allows robocalls that are made to collect debts owed to or guaranteed by the Federal Government, including robocalls made to collect many student loan and mortgage debts. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
First, in addressing Thuraissigiam’s argument that the federal court should exercise jurisdiction and grant him relief in the form of a new hearing by reason of the Suspension Clause, Alito posited that the inquiry should ask how the Founding generation understood that clause in 1789. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
On June 25, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam, an asylum-seeker, does not have a constitutional right to habeas corpus review in federal court of his claims that the government violated his constitutional, statutory and regulatory rights in issuing an order for his expedited removal. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:05 am by Ediberto Roman
President Trump cried foul after the U. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:23 am by Eric Goldman
This subsection is forward-looking and intended to encourage innovation and the development of technological solutions to facilitate and govern the submission of requests to opt-out. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:27 pm by Phillips & Associates
The law says that, if you are a federal government worker, you are only allowed to pursue discrimination claims based on federal law, not state law. [read post]