Search for: "US v. Brown" Results 1381 - 1400 of 7,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 3:19 am by Andres
Last week the excellent Internet Cases blog reported on an new court case involving Creative Commons licences: GateHouse Media, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:03 am by Hull and Hull LLP
In the July 6, 2012 issue of The Lawyers Weekly, specific mention is made of 1318214 Ontario Limited v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:35 pm by Walter Olson
Alas, my chapter on institutional reform litigation in Schools for Misrule has proved only too relevant to the headlines: In today’s 5-4 Brown v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Ten years after the landmark Supreme Court decision Brown v Board of Education ruled that schools must be racially integrated, the city had done little to advance integration in the schools. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 1:35 am
Branch, Iowa, 454 F.3d 914, 918 (8th Cir. 2006); Altman, 330 F.3d at 203; Brown, 269 F.3d at 210; Fuller, 36 F.3d at 68; see Lesher, 12 F.3d at 150-51; see Siebert, 256 F.3d at 655-56; Rabideau v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
Brown, the court tackles the common use of the “police investigation” exception to the hearsay rule. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Lauren Millward, Solicitor, Browne Jacobson LLP In recent times trade mark law in the UK has developed to comply with the fundamental principles of the EU including the free movement of goods and services within the EU. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 2:11 pm by Betty Gedlu
As part of that case, the federal court in Massachusetts heard oral arguments in Channel 781 News v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am by INFORRM
’ [57] The Court of Appeal noted that in R v Brown [2011] EWCA Crim 2571 Lord Judge CJ had reached a similar conclusion: ‘[I]t is difficult to see how a criminal act of distribution or circulation of a terrorist publication with the specific intent, or in the frame of mind expressly required as an essential ingredient of this offence to encourage or assist acts of terrorism, can be saved by reference to the principle of freedom of speech, unless that principle is… [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 8:19 am by Patricia Salkin
Here, the testimony at the hearing suggested the purpose of the investigation was to determine whether Shook had violated the land use code and, if so, to bring her back into compliance. [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:11 am by Brian F. Jackson
This may be hard to follow, but stay with us… To recap, in 2015, the Obama Board issued a decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, and vastly expanded the situations in which a franchisor or a source employer could be deemed a joint employer with its franchisee or with a supplier of a contingent workforce. [read post]