Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2022, 10:27 am
United States (Cultural Resources; Sacred Sites; Chi'chil Biłdagoteel) United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
United States DOL, 2024 U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Johnson (2008), United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:10 am
Young v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:46 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Supreme Court Order (01/11/12): In light of the United States Supreme Court's order vacating our judgment in the above-entitled case and remanding the cause to this court "for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
(United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:36 am
Check out United States v. 32.42 Acres of Land, No. 10-56568 (9th Cir. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 5:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:27 am
The United States Supreme Court announced this rule in the case of California v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Wade and 16 states have guaranteed abortion, including states such as California, Illinois and New York that hold a significant percentage of the population. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 5:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 4:10 am
Soledad Veterans Memorial property for the federal government's use ... as a national memorial honoring veterans of the United States Armed Forces. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
In two published decisions the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied class certification in putative class actions brought by current and former users of the prescription drug Paxil against GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. [read post]
