Search for: "United States v. Chambers"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
This preamble leads to a note on Case C 553/11 Bernhard Rintisch v Klaus Eder, a ruling last Thursday from the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber). [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 7:03 am
The serpent in this case, according to the defendants, was the United States government. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
THE UNITED KINGDOM – 26766/05 [2011] ECHR 2127 (15 December 2011) December 15, 2011 ECtHR Grand Chamber: Use of hearsay evidence in criminal trials not necessarily breach of Art.6, but may be if sole and decisive reason for conviction. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
The district court in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, Rachel VanLandingham urges the justices to review Larrabee v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 1:04 pm
In Yates and in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 2:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
JacksonDocket: 10-735Issue(s): Whether the Due Process Clause prevents state courts from employing the class-action device to eliminate fundamental substantive and procedural protections that would otherwise apply to adjudications of class members' individual claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 4th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United… [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 5:42 am
Since 1992, elected officials have introduced more than 1,400 proposed amendments in Congress for consideration, and not one has received the two-thirds vote required in both chambers to move forward to the states for ratification, where 38—or three-fourths of—states are needed to add the amendment to the Constitution. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether that agency’s administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:31 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Ohio or Roe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:45 am
United States: The Right of the United States Citizens of Puerto Rico to Vote for the President and the Need to Re-evaluate America’s Territorial Policy. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
And Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:53 am
For instance, in its judgment on reparations of February 2022 in the case “Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
A constitutional amendment generally requires either a convention or two-thirds affirmative vote in both chambers of Congress, followed by ratification in three-quarters of states. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 2:49 am
Among the significant opinions he authored was United States v. [read post]
