Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
On an operational level, and for most students of law in the United States, the study of the practices and approaches of judges is important for another reason. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:30 pm
Earle Partington was the civilian defense counsel in both the trial and appeal of the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:53 pm
V. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 5:10 am
ITC Limited v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 12:36 pm
Happy Green Company LLC, (“Applicant”) filed a trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for the mark Anthō for goods in International Class 3 including, but not limited to beauty products and cosmetics; skin care preparations; and perfumes and colognes. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:22 pm
As another recent article notes, the restaurant industry is no stranger to trademark issues, including the lawsuit recently launched by the Wild Wing restaurant chain in Aurora, Ontario against Buffalo Wild Wings, a United States franchise operator that is expanding into Canada. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Marks on behalf of SM v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 12:13 pm
Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
Lawrence has had the effect of invalidating similar laws throughout the United States that purport to criminalize homosexual activity between consenting adults acting in private. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:17 am
The Board noted that Allright did not allege prior use of its mark in the United States, nor ownership of a U.S. registration. [read post]
15 May 2010, 7:56 am
United States, 2010 D.C. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:01 am
In Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
If they did, the Chevron framework in administrative law would be hard to justify-at least if Chevron is to be justified, as it is in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:16 pm
Facts: This case (Design Ideas Ltd v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
United States] we see no ground for reaching a different conclusion here. [read post]
