Search for: "United States v. Moore" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
C-61 (Michael Geist) Moore's strong rejection of three strikes model for Canada (Michael Geist) Liberals say digital locks top issue as Moore open to changes (Michael Geist) Copyright Modernization Week(s!) [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm by INFORRM
(Case No. 07-1853cv), the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that a Bankruptcy Code Provision [11 U.S.C. sec. 526(a)(4)] did not violate the First Amendment freedom of speech rights of attorney Zenas Zelotes. [read post]
23 May 2010, 11:36 pm
Moore (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps 1-800 Contacts - How much does 1-800 Contacts hate competitive keyword advertising? [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
" Human Rights Watch says the United States has 2,574 inmates serving life terms for crimes they committed before age 18. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am by INFORRM
  Martin Moore’s blog has an “Election coverage stats special”. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 12:07 am by Michael Geist
  First, thank you to Industry Minister Clement and Canadian Heritage Minister Moore for launching this consultation. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: United States v. [read post]