Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Haynie v State, 468 Mich 302 (2003). [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
For example, if the applicant abandons an application more that one year after the first public use or sale in the United States or the first publication of the invention, all rights to the invention in the United States are effectively abandoned because the application cannot be refiled. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:50 pm
MARSHALL V. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:14 am
Per Taylor v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 2:43 pm
Philip Morris: Topping the list is United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
(Justice Willett not sitting)State of Texas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
TaylorIn Ideal Aerosmith Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:32 am
The International Court of Justice's Decision in Bosnia v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
" The law could be upheld only if the state could show it served a significant local interest that could not be furthered by a non-discriminatory law--this Oklahoma could not show.Maine v Taylor (1986) is a rare example of a Supeme Court decision upholding a state statute that discriminated against out-of-state commerce. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Taylor, D. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:22 pm
Oct. 1, 2007); Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
The Baze Decision On April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issuedits plurality opinion in Baze v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
However, district courts may not exercise their habeas jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from transferring individuals alleged to have committed crimes and detained within the territory of a foreign sovereign to that sovereign's government for criminal prosecution. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:20 am
Scope of arbitration Richfield Springs CSD v Allen, App. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:53 pm
In Progress Energy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 10:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
From: Findlaw Opinion Summaries June 12, 2008: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, CIVIL PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW, TRADE SECRETS Taylor v. [read post]
