Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 29,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 1:55 pm
Impact of Maryland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
" In some ways, Professor Amar follows the well-trodden path of liberal critics of the Supreme Court's opinion in Bush v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:05 am
In Wrigley v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:05 am
The last time the justices heard an FDCPA case (last term’s Sheriff v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
How well did the Supremes understand the military justice system in Denedo? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:07 am
Fennell lived in a marriage-like relationship for almost 6 years, Madam Justice Adair applied the British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in Austin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm
Previously, the Supreme Court decided in Montana v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
At issue in the case, known as Tanzin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
That might be a legitimate interest (pace Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:32 am
As such, when the legal history of the year 2011 is written, perhaps it will be said that Charlie Sheen was more a force for justice than the conservative majority on the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
But five justices had rejected that theory in Williams v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 12:01 am
Leser v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
EPA, and North Dakota v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:00 am
BOWLING, PETI-TIONERS v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:10 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada is hearing Prime Minister of Canada, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In the process, Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion (written on behalf of herself and the five other conservative justices) commits serious errors in historical analysis, and violates Justice Barrett's own well-taken strictures about the appropriate use of history in constitutional analysis. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am
Still, not all justices are equally engaged and their type of engagement varies as well. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
The great Chief Justice explained why courts must defer to Congress's powers; he was not aggrandizing the powers of the Court to rewrite the Constitution. [read post]
