Search for: "APPLICATION OF SHARP" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 18 October 2018 there will be an application in the case of Ward v McGovern. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Millett v Corbyn, heard 16 March 2021 (Vos MR, Sharp P, Warby LJ). [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Mionis v Democratic Press heard 27 October 2016 (Gloster, Sharp and Lindblom LJJ). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  Mrs Justice Sharp and Mr Justice Kenneth Parker will be hearing Interim Applications in the Queen’s Bench Division in London with Mr Justice Arnold and Mr Justice Newey in the Chancery Division. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
Indeed, the strain of critique that denies or rejects the importance of a sharp distinction between responsibility and duty makes it harder to critique the GP on its own terms. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am by Miriam Seifter
  The Commission further determined that the requested clarification would serve the public interest and “encourage the expeditious deployment of wireless broadband services,” and it decided that a “reasonable period of time” for acting on siting applications presumptively would be 90 days for collocation applications (that is, applications for additions to existing structures) and 150 days for other applications. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IAM) Jack Wolfskin gets some heat in Germany over its aggressive enforcement of trade mark rights in its 'paw' sign (Class 46) India Patenting landscape in India (Patent Baristas) (India Patents) Patent application filing (graphs) (ipmINDs) India's pre-grant patent oppositions - a true remedy? [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:58 am by Ann Pearson
What litigation software or applications can you learn now that you have access to and can continually use to keep those skills sharp while you’re trying to find a paralegal position? [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 9 February 2018, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of JMO v KTA. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Finally, we note that former media practitioner Sharp LJ has been appointed Vice-President of the Queen’s Bench Division for a period of 3 years from 1 January 2016. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Changes made to address similar findings on the processor issue in the CUSMA challenge were met with a sharp rebuke from the United States and a new trade challenge. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
  The application is for judicial review of the decision to refuse Ms Decoulos core participant status in the Leveson Inquiry and is, as far as we are aware, the first judicial review application relating to the Inquiry. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IAM) Jack Wolfskin gets some heat in Germany over its aggressive enforcement of trade mark rights in its 'paw' sign (Class 46) India Patenting landscape in India (Patent Baristas) (India Patents) Patent application filing (graphs) (ipmINDs) India's pre-grant patent oppositions - a true remedy? [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant’s costs. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:02 am by Joseph Kim
While in the past, sufficient performance at a law school that required college degrees would qualify applicants in a rough yes-or-no fashion, all of the law schools today heavily screen applicants. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]