Search for: "Able v. United States"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 10,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
Instead, they appealed and the United States Court of Appeals reversed the district court. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
Accord, United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 10:14 am
Judge Laporte is the United States Magistrate Judge who is hearing this case in the Federal Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 10:14 am
Judge Laporte is the United States Magistrate Judge who is hearing this case in the Federal Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court issued three decisions. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:08 am
At a minimum, those Energizer Bunny-style litigants should be able to settle that second case. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Supreme Court is United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
On September 24, 2007, the United States District Judge Michael J. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 12:18 pm
The decision, which came out on September 30, 2024, in United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:38 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Government Wins $3.16 Million Judgment Against Cocaine Smuggler at JFK Airport United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:16 am
The National Labor Relations Board filed a Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment yesterday in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v NLRB, Civil Action No. 11-2262, where District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg struck down the NLRB's "quickie election" rules because the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the new rules. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 4:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:15 pm
The Queen (on the Application of AB) v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:15 am
In Hannon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:16 pm
Amongst other questions raised, but not decided, by the opinion are whether aliens who are in the United States without authorization are included in the phrase "the people" to whom various rights are given under the Constitution. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:33 am
Chief Judge Kozinzki from the Ninth Circuit, dissenting from denial of a motion for en banc hearing in United States v. [read post]
