Search for: "Adams v. Long" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:10 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Adam Wagner was typically quick and right on Twitter yesterday to draw our attention to the relevant cases: Praha v Czech Republic, and Otto v Germany, neither of which is specifically about this three-month period but rather the six-month time limit for bringing your claim to the ECtHR in the first place. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
As it turns out, a significant error has long been woven into the story of Christie v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Citing the 1803 landmark case of Marbury v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:26 am
Traditionally, duress rendered a contract voidable only if it was physical duress (which involved a threat to the person or belongings of an individual), but following the decision of the Privy Council in Pao On v Lau Yiu Long, the concept of economic duress was also recognised. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Russ Bensing
 This is but more of the residue of the Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]