Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 1:43 pm
 Statute's clear.I agree that's what the statute says, and that the Court of Appeal gets it right.And I say that notwithstanding one of the creative -- but ultimately wrong -- arguments advanced by the California Attorney General. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:15 am
 The Superior Court largely upheld that judgment (with a little trimming for a mathematical error and some reduction of attorney's fees). [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
   A change of judge may be filed within ten days after:   The Arraignment, as long as proper notice and assignment is provided; The Arizona Appellate Court files a mandate with the Superior Court clerk. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
   A change of judge may be filed within ten days after:   The Arraignment, as long as proper notice and assignment is provided; The Arizona Appellate Court files a mandate with the Superior Court clerk. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
While “[t]he Limited Liability Company Law does not expressly authorize a buyout in a dissolution proceeding'” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920, quoting Matter of Superior Vending, LLC [Tal-Plotkin], 71 AD3d 1153, 1154), “in certain circumstances, a buyout may be an appropriate equitable remedy upon the dissolution of an LLC” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d at 920 [emphasis added]). [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” In a March 9, 2016 decision (here), Delaware Superior Court Judge Jan R. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 8:19 pm by John C. Manoog III
The Appeals Court’s Decision The appellate court affirmed, holding that Massachusetts General Laws ch. 190, § 3-803(a) allowed only one year for the filing of a claim against the personal representative of a decedent. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
The reason for this Suffolk Superior Court appeal is that (d) in this regulation was misinterpreted by the Hearing Officer after it was recklessly misrepresented by the Office of Medicaid. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
The reason for this Suffolk Superior Court appeal is that (d) in this regulation was misinterpreted by the Hearing Officer after it was recklessly misrepresented by the Office of Medicaid. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:23 pm
Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, we must adhere to Eggert and dismiss the appeal.Also of interest today from the NLJ: Former Federal Appeals Chief Judges Urge Senate to Act on Supreme Court Nominee. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
 Kazakhstan also commenced an action against the unnamed Does in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking injunctive relief and damages.On March 4, 2015, Kazakhstan initiated this limited action in King County Superior Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The court also noted that it is well-settled law of this Commonwealth since 1927, under the case of Critzer v. [read post]