Search for: "BAKER v BAKER" Results 1401 - 1420 of 4,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm by Stewart Baker
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm by Stewart Baker
It does not get more cyberlawyerly than a case the Supreme Court will be taking up this term – Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Baker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Victoria Clark
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck covered Zaidan v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm by William Appleton
  Hadley Baker shared an episode of Lawfare No Bull which featured oral arguments from Dec. 7, 2022 in Blassingame v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney argued that the government's arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]