Search for: "BAKER v. BAKER"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 4,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm
It does not get more cyberlawyerly than a case the Supreme Court will be taking up this term – Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:44 am
Jianniney v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Baker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck covered Zaidan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:20 am
Hallsmith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm
Hadley Baker shared an episode of Lawfare No Bull which featured oral arguments from Dec. 7, 2022 in Blassingame v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:21 pm
The case is Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:27 am
Baker, 2010 U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:47 pm
Id. at 10-11.Baker v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:36 am
Yesterday, the Florida First District Court of Appeals filed an opinion on a Jacksonville record expunction case, Baker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:34 pm
In today’s case (Gill v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:07 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
Robert Chesney argued that the government's arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
If Baker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Stock, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1862 (08 August 2008) Freeman, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1863 (08 August 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sony Computer Entertainment UK Ltd v Cinram Logistics UK Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 955 (08 August 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench) Collett v Smith & Anor [2008] EWHC 1962 (QB) (11 August 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Bookmakers Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors… [read post]
