Search for: "BAKER v. BAKER"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 4,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2010, 1:38 am
The remaining claim, that of Stephanie Baker, was dismissed because of failure to establish breach of duty at both common law and under s.29.Mrs Baker's appeal was allowed by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:03 pm
Katz v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18 November 2010… [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:53 am
Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
See, e.g., Boellner v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:33 am
Two weeks ago, in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v… [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v… [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Baker J simply made the relevant orders, whereas Binchy J handed down a full judgment explaining that section 27 was the reason why he refused to award the injunctions against the defamatory posts. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 7:33 pm
On Friday, in Klein v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
-v- D.B., 116 Ohio St 3rd 363 (2007), discussed but declined to follow the Michigan Court of Appeal's Doe case. [read post]
20 May 2025, 3:35 pm
The case is Baker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
” Baker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
One could suggest that the Alice v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision also had an impact. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:45 am
Baker v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Kahn v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:02 pm
Baker (07-219), the punitive damages case, is available here. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
Servs. of New York City and Morejon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
No. 140 (S.C.); Lee v. [read post]
