Search for: "BAKER v. STATE" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm by Stewart Baker
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm by Stewart Baker
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm by Stewart Baker
It does not get more cyberlawyerly than a case the Supreme Court will be taking up this term – Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
-v- D.B., 116 Ohio St 3rd 363 (2007), discussed but declined to follow the Michigan Court of Appeal's Doe case. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The complaint, as augmented by the affidavit of Singh submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss, sufficiently stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Doe v Ascend Charter Schs., 181 AD3d 648, 649-650). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:00 pm
While Judge Erdmann didn't tip his hand, Chief Judge Effron emphasized that accepting Army GAD's and the Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Government Division's arguments that CAAF had no jurisdiction would require overruling United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
The New York Times has this editorial in today's paper which states that the board is "disappointed" with Monday's ruling in Carey v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:34 am
Findley, University of Wisconsin Law School Patenting Games: Or, Baker v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Letters before action were then sent and undertakings by the first and second defendants were then given stating they would comply with the shareholders' agreement for 60 days. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
On Friday, the Harvard Clinic filed a petition for certiorari in Baker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:51 am by Amanda Pickens
January 20, 2016) (collective and class action under FLSA and state law alleging that defendant bakery operator improperly classified bakers as independent contractors and failed to pay overtime). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm by Eric Rassbach and Hannah Smith
It follows then that just as a state could not forbid bakers from baking cakes to celebrate same-sex wedding ceremonies, a state cannot force a baker to bake a cake in order to celebrate one. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
But as the dissent points out, far more relevant is the Supreme Court's summary dismissal of the appeal in Baker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
 In 1972, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the ruling of the Minnesota Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]