Search for: "BE v. State" Results 1401 - 1420 of 258,362
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2024, 5:38 pm by Smadar Ben-Natan
Finding that Israel’s control amounts to unlawful annexation, the advisory opinion makes clear that Palestine – recognized as a State by the ICC – is under unlawful control by another State. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Attached as Exhibit B is a transcript of State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 2:04 pm by Guest Author
  The recent decision by Judge Amit Mehta in United States et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:57 pm by Unknown
Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Human Services (Writ of Habeas Corpus; Child Custody; Tribal Exhaustion) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Center for Biological Diversity et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 8:23 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — “Opened-door doctrine — Extrinsic rebuttal evidence David Miller, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County for the first- and second-degree assault of a person we will refer to as “Ms. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 6:33 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In particular, the Court pointed out that the obligation to cease and desist from an act that has created a persistent state of disturbance must generally be interpreted as meaning that it not only includes the cessation of such acts, but also the performance of possible and reasonable acts to eliminate the state of disturbance, such as deletion [read post]
The bench, consisting of Justices SM Subramaniam and V Sivagnanam, noted that, although the dissemination of false information has become widespread, employing preventive detention laws against dissidents could be seen as a step backwards to colonial times. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Where evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), and the motion is not converted into one for summary judgment, the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal… [read post]