Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 6,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2025, 7:18 am
The fate of the administrative state turns on the 1935 case Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
At one level, the evident conduct of the Chief Justice's fellow Republican appointees is very immature and suggests that the Supreme Court functions in a manner that better resembles the interactions of a dysfunctional family than those of the people who head the judicial branch of the United States government. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 3:13 pm
Musta v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:43 pm
A CAAF grant in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 1:50 pm
See Randall v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:53 pm
" United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 5:35 am
Mazda Motor State. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:09 am
In opposition to State Farm's cross motion, plaintiff failed to address the branch of the cross motion which sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground of collateral estoppel. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
On these matters, though, Bartlett's an apostate conservative. ** The dictum plays the role United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:00 am
Monasky v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:35 am
Holder stated the checks had been mailed. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 5:40 pm
In Jurney v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:15 pm
The second one, State University of New York v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 2:19 pm
If one treated Chief Justice Roberts' opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is SEC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 11:02 pm
While the matter directly at hand is the scope of taxpayer standing first permitted in Flast v. [read post]
