Search for: "Brown v. State" Results 1401 - 1420 of 8,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm by WIMS
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Abercrombie & Fitch, 265 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001) (use in ads suggesting endorsement of clothing seller); Brown v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Ferguson’s “separate but equal” principle — even after the judiciary announced the opposing mandate of Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Harrison relies instead on the unreviewable finality of congressional membership decisions and pressured state ratifications, Amar on congressional power to republicanize Southern states with black suffrage, and Colby on the normative desirability of an intergenerationally-authored Fourteenth Amendment including cases like Brown and Roe.Read more » [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:32 am
In 2010, he received the Director's Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder for superior performance for his work in the prosecution of United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
The check the San Antonio couple endorsed on March 30 was an Internal Revenue Service refund of sorts -- but not in the traditional sense.The $1.34 million check was the result of a settlement between the Browns and the government in Alan Brown, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 1:26 pm by Unknown
(Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) Tanner-Brown, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:02 am
Noting that plaintiffs had been given at least four opportunities to plead their claims, Judge Brown dismissed the RICO claims with prejudice, leaving only the state law claims remaining in the commercial case. [read post]