Search for: "COOPER v. LONG" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is a lengthy dissent, particularly since the majority ruling is only a few paragraphs long. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Daniel Coles
A 2007 fisheries case out of Newfoundland, R. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Herbin-Triant (University of Massachusetts Lowell) marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Buchanan v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by SHG
When Wild Bill Douglas wrote the majority opinion in Brady v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am by jlucivero
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the National Security Law Podcast, featuring their discussion of the Mueller indictments, ACLU v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Collins
In all of these ways and others, Scalia still speaks to us … and he may continue to do so for a long time to come. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
” (e-commerce@its.best.uk, Cabinet Office 1999.)So long as those harnessed to the task of implementing policy don’t kick over the traces, the uncertain business of persuading a democratically elected legislature to enact a law is avoided.The Communication displays no enthusiasm for Article 15. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
” (e-commerce@its.best.uk, Cabinet Office 1999.)So long as those harnessed to the task of implementing policy don’t kick over the traces, the uncertain business of persuading a democratically elected legislature to enact a law is avoided.The Communication displays no enthusiasm for Article 15. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “A “witness at a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding enjoys an absolute privilege with respect to his or her testimony,” as long as the statements made are material to the issues to be resolved therein (Pfeiffer v Hoffman, 251 AD2d 94, 95 [1998]; accord Martinson v Blau, 292 AD2d 234, 235 [2002]; see Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; Wilson v Erra, 94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]). [read post]