Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 1401 - 1420 of 4,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] This is the same approach employed by Justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
SOPA and PIPA The media law landscape in the United States is dominated by comment and debate on two pieces of legislation being considered in Congress, the SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act) Bills. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:45 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the case of Markovic v. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
However the state’s dominance has always been weaker than commonly assumed. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:09 am
The Claimant abused its dominant market position pursuant to Art. 102 TFEU. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 1:23 am by Joe Mullin
EFF, together with Protect Democracy, filed a friend-of-the-court brief in a lawsuit challenging the law, Netchoice v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:22 am
In 2005, the Supreme Court held that the transfer of branded software constitutes a sale and is exigible to sales tax, levied by State Governments under Entry 54, Schedule VII of the Constitution (Tata Consultancy Services v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:49 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Rationale of Patel EngineeringTwo dominant themes dominate the reasoning in Patel Engineering (1) the jurisdictional facts rationale, (2) credibility. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Nearly two decades ago, Graber contended that Chief Justice Roger Taney’s infamous pro-slavery majority opinion for the Court in Dred Scott v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Constitution guaranteed that every state would have two Senators regardless of population, and immunized the states’ equal representation in the Senate from the ordinary process of amendment in Article V, requiring each state to consent to changing its equal representation in the Senate. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States, 530 U.S. 428, 120 S.Ct. 2326, 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000); United States v. [read post]