Search for: "Doe v. Delaware" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am by INFORRM
 FBUK’s consistent position was that it does not control user content on Facebook social media, which control rests with Facebook Inc (a Delaware corporation), and Facebook Ireland. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:24 am
The case is Esopus Creek Value LP v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:00 am by Judy Selby
Although the Court relied exclusively on other district court decisions with regard to its injury in fact ruling, the outcome here is consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clapper v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:00 am by J. Robert Brown
And on this point, Delaware law is clear: Under Blasius, where director conduct is designed to frustrate the outcome of a shareholder vote or impede the shareholder franchise, the business judgment rule does not apply and directors must provide a “compelling justification” for their actions. . . . [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:00 am by Neil Rosen (Toronto)
This aligns with the recent U.S. decision in DFC Global Corp. v Muirfield Value Partners, LP, where the Delaware Supreme Court strongly endorsed deal price as often “the best evidence of fair value” under the Delaware appraisal remedy, particularly in situations involving an arm’s length public company merger resulting from a robust sale process. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
  Now, earlier this week the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 41-page opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:27 pm by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Therefore, a conflict of law exists—does Michigan law apply or does Delaware or Alaska law apply. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:27 pm by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Therefore, a conflict of law exists—does Michigan law apply or does Delaware or Alaska law apply. [read post]