Search for: "Does 1 - 10"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 43,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Health-Care Data Analysis Patent Satisfies “Financial Product or Service” Requirement for CBM Review
14 Sep 2015, 7:12 am
We have considered Patent Owner’s contention, but hold that AIA § 18(d)(1) does not require that the claimed invention particularly target the financial industry as argued by Patent Owner. . . . [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 1:07 pm
R. 4-1(c)(6), requires an Anders brief. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:09 pm
Does GPS Surveillance Justify A Departure from the Knotts/Karo Line? [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:25 am
Forbes: UnFair: Exposing The IRS -- Does Not Make Strong Case Or Decent Documentary, by Peter C. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 10:12 am
How Does Illinois Define Cannabis Delivery Crimes? [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:39 am
How SEC Whistleblower Awards Are Determined The general rule for the award amount is 10% to 30% of all monetary fines collected from the entities in question based on a judgment in excess of $1 million. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 12:03 pm
The answer, in most instances, is one (1) year from the date of the injury. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 12:03 pm
The answer, in most instances, is one (1) year from the date of the injury. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
Those articles were posted on this site on May 3, September 10 and 27, 2017. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
”[1] So, applying the Proclamation to immigrant visa holders would not violate WTO GATS obligations. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:24 am
In re: Comer, No. 10-294 U.S. petition for writ of mandamus denied 1/10/10). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
SECTION 1-201. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:16 am
Does it meet the definition of health plan under 45 CFR 160.103? [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:00 pm
He is rated 10/10 on AVVO.com, and is rated by Martindale-Hubbell as an AV Preeminent Lawyer (the highest level of professional excellence). [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 pm
He is rated 10/10 on AVVO.com, and is rated by Martindale-Hubbell as an AV Preeminent Lawyer (the highest level of professional excellence). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 12:10 pm
Comments must be received by December 10, 2010. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
State, 2007 OK CR 10, 2007 Okla. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
The frequency of such claims beg the questions (1) what exactly is a “confidential relationship,” and (2) what is the practical benefit to an objectant in establishing that one existed? [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
With communication of 11 December 2008 the Receiving Section issued a noting of loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC in respect of European application No. 05 858 797.3, informing the original applicant that the application was deemed to be withdrawn (Rule 160(1) EPC) for non-performance of the acts required by Rule 159(1) EPC for entry into the European phase.VI. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:51 pm
A key issue in the case is how long does following an individual without first obtaining a warrant become a violation of that person's Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
