Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 1401 - 1420 of 28,793
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 5:39 am by Eugene Volokh
If Steve Wynn does not yet know their identities, there is nothing preventing him from filing a lawsuit against "Judy Does 1-9. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:33 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
None of the pending appeals before the UPC appears to deal with this exception, and yet most of the appeals have not added 2 TQJs to the 3 LQJs to obtain a 5-judge panel under Article 9(1).This question of the composition of Court of Appeal panels does not seem to have been bluntly disregarded by the UPC. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 9:24 am by Marty Lederman
 (The relevant colloquy is at approximately 1:34:00-1:40:20 of the audio file.) [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
The JR application was effectively on the basis that a child who fell under s.20(1)(c), a G did, was owed the s.20 accommodation duty. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm by Cindy Schmitt Minniti
The regulation is currently slated to take effect on April 1, 2014 for employers with 20 or more workers. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:02 am
The rating takes place at the rating physician's office and lasts approximately one (1) hour depending on the impairment. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Question #1 – H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Can my spouse apply for an H-1B or does she have to apply for an H-4? [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Doe alleges that Dordoni counseled him on the process for submitting his Form I-20 in order to obtain a Certificate of Eligibility for Non-Immigration (F-1) Student status. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:35 am by Bexis
  Slip op. at 20-23.(3) Certain factual amendments, but no causes of action, were permitted because their causal relationship to the plaintiffs' alleged injuries could not be determined on the pleadings. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 4:14 am by Jon L. Gelman
  The floor amendments were:     (1)  exclude from the definition of employer any contractor as that term is defined in section 3 of P.L.1999, c.238 (C.34:11-56.50); and        (2)  provide that the bill does not apply to athletes employed by professional sports teams. [read post]