Search for: "Does 1 to 10"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 43,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 6:39 am
How SEC Whistleblower Awards Are Determined The general rule for the award amount is 10% to 30% of all monetary fines collected from the entities in question based on a judgment in excess of $1 million. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:24 am
In re: Comer, No. 10-294 U.S. petition for writ of mandamus denied 1/10/10). [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 12:03 pm
The answer, in most instances, is one (1) year from the date of the injury. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 12:03 pm
The answer, in most instances, is one (1) year from the date of the injury. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
Those articles were posted on this site on May 3, September 10 and 27, 2017. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
”[1] So, applying the Proclamation to immigrant visa holders would not violate WTO GATS obligations. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:16 am
Does it meet the definition of health plan under 45 CFR 160.103? [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
SECTION 1-201. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:00 pm
He is rated 10/10 on AVVO.com, and is rated by Martindale-Hubbell as an AV Preeminent Lawyer (the highest level of professional excellence). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 12:10 pm
Comments must be received by December 10, 2010. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
State, 2007 OK CR 10, 2007 Okla. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
The frequency of such claims beg the questions (1) what exactly is a “confidential relationship,” and (2) what is the practical benefit to an objectant in establishing that one existed? [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
With communication of 11 December 2008 the Receiving Section issued a noting of loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC in respect of European application No. 05 858 797.3, informing the original applicant that the application was deemed to be withdrawn (Rule 160(1) EPC) for non-performance of the acts required by Rule 159(1) EPC for entry into the European phase.VI. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:51 pm
A key issue in the case is how long does following an individual without first obtaining a warrant become a violation of that person's Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:08 am
On October 1, 2018, Trustee filed a letter saying Attorney still hadn’t complied. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 10:16 pm
You then gave her a lighter sentence than you ordinarily would have given. ...10. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 8:25 pm
LEXIS 92 (August 10, 2011): P16 Although Defendant gave specific and unequivocal consent, we conclude that the consent was given under duress and coercive circumstances. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 6:35 am
October 10, 2007). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:56 am
Obama, 10-1469 (JDB) (D. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 7:31 am
September 10, 2007): The Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule does not apply where the challenged evidence was obtained by an officer acting in objectively reasonable reliance on a statute even if that statute was later determined to be unconstitutional. [read post]
