Search for: "Does 1-20 inclusive"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
Specifically, Federal Rule 68 distinguishes between the “judgment on specified terms” and “the costs then accrued,” leaving the court with discretion to determine appropriate “costs” when the Offer of Judgment does not specify the inclusion of costs and their specific amount. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:05 pm
1. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:34 am
To book your place, do get in touch with Lisa Pick by email or give her a call on +44 20 7242 2523. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
June 20, 2011 David Hart QC Hey, teacher! [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
1. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Inclusion of a dual-criminality clause rather than a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as offenses become punishable under the laws of both parties. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:22 am
” “Nobody does, but it’s over now. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on March 1, 1971. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
" Steve Meyerowitz, a director of the association, said the goal of the campaign "is to make consumers aware of the many health benefits, taste and variety offered by the inclusion of both raw and cooked sprouts in our daily diets. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The Board therefore does not find such an argument persuasive. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:25 am
This is the danger in the inclusion of public policy subsidies into the renewable energy value network. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:28 am
Canterbury is easily reached by fast train out of London St Pancras (1 hour) or out of Paris (2 hours on the Eurostar to Ashford International and 20 minutes on a local connecting train). [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:29 pm
It does not appear as of May 16, 2011 that the Plaintiffs are ready to push this matter. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:04 pm
It is to be another version of TSCA, far less harmful but having a law that does cover the bases. [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:15 pm
” For example, if a business employs 40 full-time employees with 40 hours of service per week and 20 part-time employees with an average of 20 hours of service per week, the employer will still be considered an “applicable large employer. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:16 pm
Appellant owns land south of the city, with a portion of said land exceeding 20 acres in size lying within the District. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:00 am
Inclusion of a dual criminality clause without a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as offenses become punishable under the laws of both parties. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Inclusion of a dual-criminality clause without a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as offenses become punishable under the laws of both parties. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:01 pm
Since this influence was not taken into account claim 1 was unclear and not supported by the description. [2.2.2] The Board does not share this position. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:28 pm
The idea of Free Access to Law, although it has been around for nearly 20 years in Canada, was entirely new to me in October 2009. [read post]
