Search for: "Does 1-58"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2017, 1:48 pm
§ 13-1-1 or O.C.G.A. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
IRS does not collect comments or messages on this site. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:35 am
(Article 78 and 58, 「Act on Registration, etc., of Family Relationship」). [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:35 am
(Article 78 and 58, 「Act on Registration, etc., of Family Relationship」). [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 11:44 am
This also does not include local laws or ordinances passed by various California counties (58) or other municipalities (482) or other governmental entities. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:20 pm
The 30 subjects were between 17 and 58 years old. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
While there seems to be overlap between Article 1(3) and Article 15(1), this does not mean that matters permitted on the basis of Article 15(1) fall outside the scope of the directive as “otherwise that provision would be deprived of any purpose” [para 73]. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
How did (does) her Judaism figure into Ginsburg’s life? [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:45 am
The court doesn’t exactly say, but it suggests that retention must be limited to serious crimes, must be targeted, and must be limited to “what is strictly necessary”: However, Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in the light of Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter, does not prevent a Member State from adopting legislation permitting, as a preventive measure, the targeted retention of traffic and location… [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:08 am
[The court of appeals does not say the same for MySpace.] [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am
First, citing Business Corporation Law § 508 and the Second Department’s decision in Essig v 5670 58 St. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:03 pm
1. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:16 pm
App. 58 (2006). [6] 38 C.F.R. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:16 pm
App. 58 (2006). [6] 38 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm
AOL News UK reported V (A Child) (Rev 1) [2016] EWFC 58 (01 December 2016) on the basis that this was a second published judgment where councils and staff were not named despite being criticized and held to account. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:16 am
Originally posted 2013-05-22 21:25:58. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:59 am
’Today's AG OpinionThis morning Advocate General (AG) Manuel Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered his Opinion, and held the view that:(1) the sale of a multimedia player of the kind at issue in the main proceedings constitutes “communication to the public” within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive [note (para 33) that the submission of the Commission is that in the case at hand Article 3(1)… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Adding a new Treaty to section 1 of the ECA 1972 would require further primary legislation. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that merely because an area is reserved under the devolution settlement, does not mean that consent is not required for that reason alone. 15.41 Lord Wilson notes that many of the Court are struggling to see the relevance of the legislative consent convention to the central issue in this case. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
It does not alter the position regarding prerogative power. [read post]
