Search for: "Downs v. USA"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
Nike went after one end user for ordering Chinese counterfeit trainers via the Internet: EWPCC summary judgement in Nike v E Bateman (IP Dragon) Crosstown Music bitten by partial assignment of copyright: EWCA decision in Crosstown v Rive Droite & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Possibility of obtaining summary judgment in patent cases: Patents Court decision in Virgin Atlantic v Delta (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keeping down the price of copyright justice (1709 Blog) United… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:14 pm
The case is USA v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
However, given the maximalist mood in the USA, one cannot predict what Congress will do here. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
We would all go down together!! [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
SCM Group USA, Inc., 586 S.E.2d at 731. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm
That changed in 2004, when a unanimous Supreme Court strongly affirmed its support for a balanced approach to copyright law and in the process breathed new life into the Copyright Act’s fair dealing provision in a case called Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Dora the Explorer Suit settled Supreme Court Denies Cert in Harper (innocent infringer) file sharing case Maverick Recordings v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps BP Lubricants – United States files amicus curiae brief arguing that Rule 9(b) should apply in false marking cases – In re BP Lubricants USA Inc (Gray on Claims) Butterball – False marking plaintiffs get creative and dig deeper to support intent to deceive allegations: Buyers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:00 am
For the USA to argue this is hypocritical. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
Highlights this week included: US: Prosecutors dismiss Xbox-modding case mid-trial: USA v Crippen (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (1709 Blog) CAFC: Section 101 and process claims: Research Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), PMA cases basically boil down to “parallel” violation claims. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Maersk Contractrors USA, Inc (IP Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Columbia University’s School for Engineering and Applied Science – Columbia’s patented smart grid technology to power FedEx’s NYC EV Fleet (Green Patent Blog) Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products – ALJ Gildea grants motion to terminate investigation in Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices (337-TA-718) based on consent order (ITC Law Blog) GS Cleantech –… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:15 pm
The new petition in the tobacco case, Philip Morris USA, et al., v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
Discussion and analysis of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Finally, based on the experience with the state competition for corporate charters in the USA, the impact of a jurisdiction’s courts and the admissibility of arbitration proceedings is analysed within the context of regulatory competition in company law in Europe. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
As briefly reported in this previous post, the Fifth District Court of Appeal today reversed the grant of summary adjudication by the Fresno trial court in favor of the Episcopal Church (USA) and Bishop Jerry Lamb. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am
But before closing off we make two points:In First Options of Chicago v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:26 am
" Carnival v. [read post]
