Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
There is no presumption in English law that exemption clauses do not apply to fundamental breaches. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am
Yesterday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:15 pm
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Tuesday filed a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
USA v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro looks at the remaining cases on the Court’s docket, while I do the same in Plain English for this blog. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:39 pm
For example, you can see the development of “American English” (and its deviation from “British English”) by plugging in the words “color” and “colour. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
The courts should take into account agreements such as the MoU and should assume that they would be adhered to, following RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2009) UKHL. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:00 pm
In Guaranty Trust Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:30 am
In Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 6:37 pm
NMCAA's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 7:53 am
” Quoting English v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:58 am
It would have been entirely foreseeable by SOMO that a majority of the letters of credit against which they sold oil would be issued out of London and subject to English law. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Canada is not a US State, and indeed a different country with different laws. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 am
On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court rendered its decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing) Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
