Search for: "English v. State" Results 1401 - 1420 of 6,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
However, Group Chimiche Tunisien countered this, stating that the July contract contained no clause for London arbitration and therefore the dispute could be resolved in the courts of Tunisia.Midgulf submitted that the parties had contracted in July on the basis of Midgulf's offer, which stated that jurisdiction and arbitration were to be in accordance with the June contract which provided for English law and London arbitration, which was accepted orally. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 5:00 am by Sarah Friedman
She is a second-year Ph.D. student in English at the University of Missouri. [read post]
On 4 August 2022, the English Patents court handed down its decision in Shenzhen Carku Technology Co., Ltd v The NOCO Company, a case on battery-powered car jump starters. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:29 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am by CMS
CMR applies to the international carriage of goods by road between contracting states, and is enacted into English law by the Carriage of Goods by Road Act 1965. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Catholic University Law Review, v. 64, no. 2 (2015); Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-21. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:13 am by Samuel Bray
Earlier this week, a panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Arizona v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
I'll pair those readings with the opinions from the same courts in State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am by David Kopel
Oklahoma City University’s Michael O’Shea explains  the history and multiple meanings of United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber stated in Cumpana v Romania on 17 December 2004 at paragraph 91, in the context of a publication covered by Article 10, that Article 8 “may require the adoption of positive measures designed to secure effective respect for private life even in the sp [read post]