Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 1401 - 1420 of 30,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
At Monday's oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:22 am by HL Chronicle of Data Protection
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s much anticipated ruling in FTC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:46 am by assoulineberlowe
Defense Defense attorneys who were celebrating the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal’s July 28, 2011 decision in Dionne v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
The Ninth Circuit, however, recently held in Dep’t of Fair Emp’t & Hous. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Venkat
BeckonEmployee Blogging RisksEmployee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim -- Barnett v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:18 am by Adam Wagner
She stated that modern marriage still possesses an irreducible minimum, which includes a couple’s mutual duty to support one another and their children. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:26 pm by Mark Engstrom
The judgment of the district court was vacated and the case was remanded so the district court could determine whether personal jurisdiction would be reasonable and fair (Polar Electro Oy v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]