Search for: "FLOYD JUSTICE"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2012, 9:52 pm
Justice Floyd and the Court of Appeal on two occasions (see MMI Research Ltd v CellXion Ltd and Others [2009] Info TLR 35, [2009] EWHC 418 (Pat) (11 March 2009) and MMI Research Ltd v CellXion Ltd and Others [2011] EWHC 426 (Pat) (7 March 2011). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
" The 2011 Super Lawyers Pro Bono Award recipients include: Paul Alston, Attorney; Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing; Honolulu, HI: Successfully led cases involving the renovation of Hawaii's two largest housing projects, mandated a more timely food stamp application process in Hawaii and represented people with disabilities and the mentally ill. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:59 pm
High Court Misses Opportunity to Discuss Ethical Obligations of Prosecutors By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair For reasons we discussed in a previous post, the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:42 am
Justice Department Antitrust Division during the George W. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
That is the question raised by last month’s decision from Mr Justice Floyd in Omnipharm Ltd v Merial [2011] EWHC 3393 (Pat). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Floyd, 251 F. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:55 am
Department of Justice to avoid being indicted for charges arising out of seven different sting operations conducted over eight years by the government’s prosecutors. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:13 pm
Floyd McKissick, a Durham Democrat, who was the primary sponsor of the Racial Justice Act and is chairman of the black caucus in the General Assembly. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:42 pm
Justice Floyd's in Re [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:35 pm
It’s an unfortunate commentary on our criminal justice system when these two important must be instructed by the highest court in the nation to obey the law and uphold our most cherished constitutional tenets: right to a fair trial and right to counsel. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:59 am
Floyd McKissick, a Durham Democrat who was the primary author of the Racial Justice Act, made his own impassioned speech to defeat the new bill. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
Via Techdirt, even Floyd Abrams, a constitutional scholar who represents content companies that strongly back SOPA, conceded in a recent letter to Congress that unanswered questions remain regarding the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:05 am
At paragraph 72 the Court describes it as " a public which was not taken into account by the authors of the protected works within the framework of an authorisation given to another person".As yesterday's Katpost pointed out, Mr Justice Floyd was not enchanted by the notion of "new public" or by the degree of imprecision which it produced. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:35 am
” And, based on their comments to the Telegraph, members of the Giddings family want justice for Lauren. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
Noted First Amendment expert Floyd Abrams believes the bill is fully compatible with First Amendment protections as well, as he explained in a recent letter. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
Mr Justice Floyd held that Airfield was consistent with his original view that authorisation was required. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:28 am
Justice Floyd, IBM, Qualcomm Europe, Nokia, GE Healthcare and Intel. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
Missed the first day, but here's the second:Panel 5: Social Media, Privacy and the UserModerator: Jonathan Obar (MSU)Matt Jackson (PSU)Concern about exploitation/commodification of user by marketers. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
Floyd J allowed the appeal. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
This argument succeeded at first instance before Mr Justice Simon, who found Kookmin liable; however, that judgment was overturned by the Court of Appeal (Patten and Thorpe LJJ; Tuckey LJ dissenting). [read post]
