Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Hyatt v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:21 am
In Davis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Child Evangelism Fellowship of Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 3:42 pm
DLA Piper v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 3:45 am
Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorarito take up Peter v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:46 am
” Coughlin v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:48 am
The Passport settlement also sends a clear signal that the FTC is exercising its enforcement authority against fees it considers “junk” fees and is not waiting to complete the rulemaking process it has initiated with the Motor Vehicle Dealers Trade Regulation Rule and Unfair or Deceptive Fees Trade Regulation Rule that would address, among other things, “junk” fees and bait-and-switch advertising tactics. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm
” Welch v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 7:32 am
Justice Steyn said the case was “bound to fail” and ordered Trump to pay £300,000 in legal fees to Orbis. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:22 am
All BsUFA user fees – i.e., the initial and annual biosimilar biological product development fees, the reactivation fee, and the biosimilar biological product application, establishment, and product fees – are keyed to PDUFA user fees. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 1:10 pm
It had long been argued by attorneys representing employees in these types of cases that Section 218.5 should be interpreted to mean that a prevailing employer would only be entitled to its fees if the employee’s suit was found to be frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation – a standard announced in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:47 am
The Court split four to four on March 29 in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:32 pm
Bytska v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm
The first morning of the term showed a welcome moment of camaraderie on the bench, as justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum seemed to join in their skepticism of the government’s position in Peter v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 11:36 am
However, in April of 2021, the Supreme Court decided AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:20 am
These January fee updates do the following: (i) replace the tiered entry fee structure with a flat fee of $270,000 when a Company first lists a class of equity securities on the Nasdaq Global or Global Select Market; (ii) modify the Exchange’s all-inclusive annual listing fees for all domestic and foreign companies listing equity securities covered by Listing Rules 5910 and 5920 on the Nasdaq Global Select, Global and Capital Markets; (iii) replace the… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:09 pm
Did the recoverability of the claimant’s success fees violate the applicants’ rights under Article 10 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom (no. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
In this week’s case (Plimmer v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:02 pm
” Camacho v. [read post]
